History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Perry
680 P.2d 392
Or. Ct. App.
1984
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM

Affirmed. State v. Lerch, 296 Or 377, 677 P2d 678 (1984).1

The rule that a confession must be corroborated has been critized; see State v. Lerch, supra, 296 Or at 392 n 18; see also Comment, 20 UCLA L Rev 1055, 1089 (1973); Developments in the Law - Confessions, 79 Harv L Rev 938, 1084 (1966).

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Perry
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Oregon
Date Published: May 2, 1984
Citation: 680 P.2d 392
Docket Number: C83-03-31156; CA A29106
Court Abbreviation: Or. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.