265 N.W. 302 | Minn. | 1936
The case is controlled by State v. Zanker,
"Conduct is disorderly in the ordinary sense when it is of such nature as to affect the peace and quiet of persons who may witness the same and who may be disturbed or provoked to resentment thereby."
As in the Zanker case, no question is here involved of the right of the strikers to be free from injunction. Nor is there any question relating to industrial conflicts between capital and labor. Defendants were endeavoring to carry into the home and domestic life of Gustafson an industrial controversy which should have been left elsewhere. This is no doubt the kind of picketing which led England to prohibit it. 19 Halsbury's Comp. St. of Eng. p. 746 (Trade Disputes Trade Unions Act, 1927).
Judgment affirmed. *483