State v. Peay
291 Conn. 915
Conn.
2009
Check Treatment
970 A.2d 729 (2009)
291 Conn. 915

STATE OF CONNECTICUT
v.
Abdul N. PEAY.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decided May 6, 2009.

Abdul N. Peay, pro se, in support of the petition.

Timothy J. Sugrue, senior assistant state's attorney, in opposition.

The petition by the plaintiff in error Abdul N. Peay for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 111 Conn.App. 427, 959 A.2d 655 (2008), is dented.

McLACHLAN, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.