midpage

State v. . ParishState v. . Parish

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jun 5, 1880
Reporters:
Before:
Smith
Smith, C. J.

We sustain the correctness of the ruling of the court. Such testimony by itself ‍‌‌​​‌‌​‌​​‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌​​‌​​​​‌​‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌​​​​‌‌​​​‌​​​‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​​‌‌​​​‌​​​​​‌‌​​​‌​​​‌‌​​‌‌​‌​​​​‌​‍and unconnected with evidence of the defendant’s non-intercourse during the interval necessary to his being the father, or other fact tending to disprove the charge, was held to be insufficient to-overcome the ‍‌‌​​‌‌​‌​​‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌​​‌​​​​‌​‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌​​​​‌‌​​​‌​​​‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​​‌‌​​​‌​​​​​‌‌​​​‌​​​‌‌​​‌‌​‌​​​​‌​‍statutory presumption, and by itself incompetent when offered for that purpose, in the case- of the State v. Bennett, 75 N. C., 305, and State v. Britt, 78 N. C., 439, and when offered to impeach the credit of ‍‌‌​​‌‌​‌​​‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌​​‌​​​​‌​‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌​​​​‌‌​​​‌​​​‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​​‌‌​​​‌​​​​​‌‌​​​‌​​​‌‌​​‌‌​‌​​​​‌​‍the witness, the matter of the enquiry was held to be collateral and her answer conclusive. State v. Patterson, 74 N. C., 157.

The jurisdiction iu bastardy proceedings is vested by a recent statute (acts 1879, ch. ‍‌‌​​‌‌​‌​​‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌​​‌​​​​‌​‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌​​​​‌‌​​​‌​​​‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​​‌‌​​​‌​​​​​‌‌​​​‌​​​‌‌​​‌‌​‌​​​​‌​‍92,)) exclusively in a justice of the peace, except as to such as were pending at the time of its passage in the superior, criminal, or inferior courts as in the present ‍‌‌​​‌‌​‌​​‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌​​‌​​​​‌​‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌​​​​‌‌​​​‌​​​‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​​‌‌​​​‌​​​​​‌‌​​​‌​​​‌‌​​‌‌​‌​​​​‌​‍case.

There is no error and this will be certified to the court, below.

Per Curiam;. No error.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. . Parish
Court Name: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date Published: Jun 5, 1880
Citation: 83 N.C. 613
Court Abbreviation: N.C.
Log In