History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Papandrea
297 Conn. 902
Conn.
2010
Check Treatment

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 120 Conn. App. 224 (AC 29768), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the state of Connecticut had presented sufficient evidence of the defendant’s intent to commit larceny?”

VERTEFEUILLE, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

Moira L. Buckley, in support of the petition. Timothy J. Sugrue, senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition. Decided May 20, 2010

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Papandrea
Court Name: Supreme Court of Connecticut
Date Published: May 20, 2010
Citation: 297 Conn. 902
Docket Number: SC 18616
Court Abbreviation: Conn.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.