History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Overton
75 N.C. 200
N.C.
1876
Check Treatment
Pearsok, C. J.

We have examined the record and see ím error. We have considered the two points made in the statement of the case as grounds for a venire de novo and are satisfied that neither of them is tenable. In fact both of them are so plain as not to admit of discussion.

This will be certified, to the end that judgment may be pronounced agreeable to law.

Per Curiam. Judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Overton
Court Name: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date Published: Jun 15, 1876
Citation: 75 N.C. 200
Court Abbreviation: N.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.