midpage

State v. OtteState v. Otte

Ohio Supreme Court
May 15, 1996
94-2622
Versions:75 Ohio St. 3d 1484
664 N.E.2d 537

Cuyahoga County, No. 64617. UPON CONSIDERATION of the motion filed by counsel for appellant to stay the execution of sentence in the above-styled cause pending the timely filing of a petition for a writ of certiorari in the Supreme Court of the United States, IT IS ORDERED that said motion be, and the same is hereby, granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the compliance with the mandate and the execution of sentence be, and the same are hereby, stayed pending the timely filing of the petition in the Supreme Court of the United States.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if such petition is timely filed, this stay shall continue for an indefinite period pending final disposition of this cause by the Supreme Court of the United States.

*1485F.E. Sweeney and Cook, JJ., would grant the stay to a date certain. Pfeifer J., would grant the stay to a date certain, one hundred eighty days from today. Stratton, J., would grant but reset.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Otte
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: May 15, 1996
Citations: 75 Ohio St. 3d 1484; 664 N.E.2d 537; 94-2622
Docket Number: 94-2622
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
Log In