State v. OrgeronState v. Orgeron
On November 20, 1995, the Jefferson Parish District Attorney filed a bill of information charging defendant, Kerry Orgeron, with three counts of purse snatching in violation of
We note ex proprio motu that the appeal is untimely.
A. A motion for an appeal may be made orally in open court or by filing a written motion with the clerk. The motions shall be entered in the minutes of the court.
B. The motion for an appeal must be made no later than:
(1) Five days after the rendition of the judgment or ruling from which the appeal is taken.
(2) Five days from the ruling on the motion to reconsider sentence filed pursuant to Article 881.1, should such a motion be filed.
In the instant case, the oral motion for reconsideration of sentence was denied on December 9, 1996, and the written motion for appeal was filed on August 29, 1997. Clearly the appeal motion was filed well beyond the five days allowed by the Code of Criminal Procedure. Although the minute entry of the December 9, 1996 sentencing indicates that defense counsel made an oral motion for appeal, the transcript shows that no such motion was made. Where there is a discrepancy between the transcript and the minute entry it is the transcript which prevails. State v. Lynch, 441 So.2d 732 (La.1983); State v. Haynes, 96-84 (La.App. 5 Cir. 6/25/96), 676 So.2d 1120.
Because this appeal is untimely, defendant‘s conviction and sentence are not subject to review by ordinary appellate process. The defendant must first obtain reinstatement of his right to appeal by application for post conviction relief to the district court. State v. Ockmand, 95-413 (La.App. 5 Cir 11/28/95), 665 So.2d 588. As we explained in Ockmand, 665 So.2d at 589:
Upon expiration of the time limitations for seeking an appeal, the conviction and the sentence imposed become final and are no longer subject to review under ordinary appellate process unless the defendant obtains reinstatement of his right to appeal. State v. Counterman, 475 So.2d 336 (La. 1985); State v. Edwards, 590 So.2d 795 (La.App. 5th Cir.1991). An application for post conviction relief under
LSA-C.Cr.P. arts. 924-930.8 is the appropriate procedural vehicle to seek the exercise of appealrights after the legal delays have expired. State v. Counterman, supra.
We find nothing in the record which establishes that Orgeron obtained reinstatement of his appeal right.
For the foregoing reasons, the appeal is dismissed and the matter is remanded to allow defendant an opportunity to seek reinstatement of his right to appeal through an application for post conviction relief to the district court.
DISMISSED AND REMANDED.