History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Olson
130 Wash. 708
Wash.
1924
Check Treatment

Dissenting Opinion

Pemberton, J.

(dissenting) — I concur in the views expressed by Judge Tolman in his dissenting opinion, and therefore dissent.






Rehearing

On Rehearing.

Per Curiam.

Upon a rehearing En Baño, a majority of the court adhere to the views expressed in the Departmental opinion heretofore filed herein, as reported in 127 Wash. 300, 220 Pac. 776. Therefore the judgment, modified as in that opinion indicated, is affirmed. The appellants will recover their costs here.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Olson
Court Name: Washington Supreme Court
Date Published: Jun 30, 1924
Citation: 130 Wash. 708
Docket Number: No. 18187
Court Abbreviation: Wash.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.