State v. Novoa, 223 Conn. 905

State v. Novoa

223 Conn. 905

Conn.

1992

Check Treatment

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 27 Conn. App. 596, is granted, limited to the following question:

Bruce A. Sturman, public defender, in support of the petition. Kevin T. Kane, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition. Decided June 25, 1992

“In the circumstances of this case, was the use of wiretap evidence permitted by the provisions of General Statutes §§ 54-41p (b) and 54-41b?”