State v. NixState v. Nix
JUDGMENT: AFFIRMED
Amichai Eitan Zukowsky
Zukowsky Law Firm L.L.C.
23811 Chagrin Boulevard, Suite 160
Beachwood, Ohio 44122
ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE
Michael C. O‘Malley
Cuyahoga County Prosecutor
BY: Khalilah Lawson
Assistant Prosecuting Attorney
The Justice Center, 9th Floor
1200 Ontario Street
Cleveland, Ohio 44113
EILEEN A. GALLAGHER, A.J.:
{1} Defendant-appellant Bobby Nix, appeals his sentence after he pled guilty to one count of drug possession and was sentenced accordingly. Nix contends his sentence should be vacated because the trial court failed to advise him of his right to appeal as set forth in
{2} On January 30, 2018, Nix pled guilty to one count of drug possession in violation of
{3} On March 5, 2018, Nix filed, pro se, a notice of appeal, a motion for leave to file a delayed appeal based on the trial court‘s failed to advise him of his appellate rights at sentencing and a motion for appointment of counsel. This court granted Nix‘s motion for leave to file a delayed appeal and appointed counsel to represent him. In his sole assignment of error, Nix
{4}
(2) After imposing sentence in a serious offense, the court shall advise the defendant of the defendant‘s right, where applicable, to appeal or to seek leave to appeal the sentence imposed.
(3) If a right to appeal or a right to seek leave to appeal applies under division (B)(1) or (B)(2) of this rule, the court also shall advise the defendant of all of the following:
(a) That if the defendant is unable to pay the cost of an appeal, the defendant has the right to appeal without payment;
(b) That if the defendant is unable to obtain counsel for an appeal, counsel will be appointed without cost;
(c) That if the defendant is unable to pay the costs of documents necessary to an appeal, the documents will be provided without cost;
(d) That the defendant has a right to have a notice of appeal timely filed on his or her behalf.
Upon defendant‘s request, the court shall forthwith appoint counsel for appeal.
{5} In this case, the transcript from the sentencing hearing contains no advisement of Nix‘s appellate rights under
{6} As this court has previously held, a trial court‘s failure to advise a defendant of his or her appellate rights at sentencing renders the sentence voidable, not void. See, e.g., State v. Davner, 2017-Ohio-8862, 100 N.E.3d 1247, ¶ 36, fn. 6 (8th Dist.), citing State v. Gum, 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 101496, 2015-Ohio-1539, ¶ 8. Where the trial court fails to advise a defendant of his appellate rights at sentencing, the remedy is not “a complete re-sentencing hearing“; it is to have the trial court reenter the judgment of conviction against the defendant, thereby reinstating the time within which the defendant may file a notice of appeal pursuant to
{7} In this case, after his sentencing, Nix filed, pro se, a motion for leave to file a delayed appeal. Because Nix‘s motion to file a delayed appeal was granted and counsel was appointed to represent him in the appeal, Nix was “able to effect a timely appeal through counsel” and has not been prejudiced by the trial court‘s failure to advise him of his appellate rights. State v. El, 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 105089, 2017-Ohio-8165, ¶ 13. Accordingly, the trial court‘s failure to notify Nix of his right to appeal his sentence is, therefore, harmless. See, e.g., id. at ¶ 12-13; State v. Hunter, 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 99472, 2013-Ohio-5022, ¶ 24; see also State v. Thomas, 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 94788, 2011-Ohio-214, ¶ 38 (defendant‘s argument that the trial court failed to advise him of his appellate rights under
{8} Further, the only error Nix has claimed in this appeal is the trial court‘s failure to notify him of his appellate rights. Nix has not claimed the existence of any other error for which he contends relief would be warranted on appeal.
{9} Nix‘s assignment of error is overruled.
{10} Judgment affirmed.
It is ordered that appellee recover from appellant the costs herein taxed.
A certified copy of this entry shall constitute the mandate pursuant to
EILEEN A. GALLAGHER, ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE
ANITA LASTER MAYS, J., and
LARRY A. JONES, SR., J., CONCUR