State v. Nieberg
97 N.J.L. 348
N.J.
1922
Check Treatment
Per Curiam..

The same questions, decided in State v. Solomon, No. 44 of the November term, 1921, and' which resulted in a reversal of the judgment in that case> were involved in the present case, and1, consequently, under the decision referred to the present judgment must be reversed.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Trenchard, Williams, JJ. 3.

F-or r&uersal — Sway.ze, Parker, JIinturn, Ivalisch, Black, White, Hbppenheimer, Gardner, Van Buskirk, JJ. 9.