State v. New York, Susquehanna & Western Railroad

105 N.J.L. 253 | N.J. | 1928

Pee Cueiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Chief Justice in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellok, Mintuen, Katzenbach, White, Yak Buskiek, McGlennon, Kays, Deae, JJ. 8.

For reversal — Paekee, J. 1.