97-K-3161 | La. | Jun 26, 1998

714 So. 2d 698" court="La." date_filed="1998-06-26" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/state-v-narcisse-1102387?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="1102387">714 So. 2d 698 (1998)

STATE of Louisiana
v.
Raymond NARCISSE.

No. 97-K-3161.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 26, 1998.

*699 PER CURIAM.[*]

Granted. Relator's sentence is vacated and this case is remanded to the district court for resentencing.

A trial court may not require restitution to the victim "unless the imposition or execution of sentencing is suspended." State v. Clark, 93-1470 (La.App. 3 Cir.1994), 643 So. 2d 463" court="La. Ct. App." date_filed="1994-10-05" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/state-v-clark-1879259?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="1879259">643 So. 2d 463, 467, writ denied, 94-2715 (La.2/9/95), 649 So. 2d 418" court="La." date_filed="1995-02-09" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/state-v-clark-1723442?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="1723442">649 So. 2d 418; State v. Matthews, 572 So. 2d 250" court="La. Ct. App." date_filed="1990-11-14" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/state-v-matthews-1117022?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="1117022">572 So. 2d 250, 254 (La.App. 1 Cir. 1990), writ denied, 575 So. 2d 387" court="La." date_filed="1991-02-22" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/state-v-matthews-1839150?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="1839150">575 So. 2d 387 (La.1991). In addition, a trial judge lacks authority under La.R.S. 15:573.1(C) to deny a defendant eligibility for good time credits against his sentence, because that statute is "directed to the Department of Corrections exclusively." State ex rel. Simmons v. Stalder, 93-1852 (La.1/26/96), 666 So. 2d 661" court="La." date_filed="1996-01-26" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/state-ex-rel-simmons-v-stalder-1094786?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="1094786">666 So. 2d 661. Moreover, even the Department of Corrections lacks that authority under La.R.S. 15:571.3(C) in a case in which the trial court has not formally adjudicated and sentenced the defendant as a multiple offender under the provisions of La. R.S. 15:529.1. When the sentencing court is of the opinion that a denial of diminution of sentence is warranted under the specific circumstances of the case, the trial judge's discretion should be exercised under La.C.Cr.P. 890.1(B).

NOTES

[*] Victory, J., not on panel. Rule IV, part 2, § 3.

© 2024 Midpage AI does not provide legal advice. By using midpage, you consent to our Terms and Conditions.