| N.J. | Feb 28, 1921

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The ChaNCEllor, Swayze, TRENOhaed, PARKER, BERGEN, KaTZENBACII, WHITE, IÍEPPENHEIMER, Williams, Tayloe, GaedNer, AoiceesoN, JJ. 12. For reversal — None.
© 2024 Midpage AI does not provide legal advice. By using midpage, you consent to our Terms and Conditions.