146 Ind. 36 | Ind. | 1896
This prosecution is based upon sections 2 and 4 of an act of the General Assembly, approved March 11, 1895, (Acts 1895, p. 248). A state
Upon an examination of the statute as an entirety, the fallacy of appellee’s proposition is apparent. It is
Another rule controlling the interpretation of statutes is, that all the parts of the same act must be considered together, and. if one part, standing by itself, is obscure, its meaning may be disclosed by another part of the same statute. The consideration of the entire act may expand or restrict the terms of some particular clause.
By a comparison of the phrase “and other intoxicating liquors,” as it appears in section 10, with the other sections to which we have referred, it is clear that in order to arrive at the true legislative intent in which it was employed, it must be read “or other intoxicating liquors.” That “and” was there used in a disjunctive sense, in like manner as “or” in the antecedent sections. By so holding we harmonize and render section 10 consistent with the others. A construction or interpretation which produces the greatest harmony and the least inconsistency is laid down by the authorities as one of the safe guides to be followed by courts in the consideration of statutes.
No other objections against the information are presented, therefore its sufficiency, in other respects, is not considered.
Judgment reversed.