History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Mundy
2012 Ohio 2677
Ohio
2012
Check Treatment

THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. COLLINS, APPELLANT.

No. 2012-0427

Supreme Court of Ohio

Submitted June 6, 2012—Decided June 13, 2012.

132 Ohio St.3d 128, 2012-Ohio-2677

{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is accepted.

{¶ 2} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the court of appeals for application of our decision in State v. Smith, 131 Ohio St.3d 297, 2012-Ohio-781, 964 N.E.2d 423.

O‘CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O‘DONNELL, LANZINGER, CUPP, and MCGEE BROWN, JJ., concur.

Bradley Collins, pro se.

THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. MUNDY, APPELLANT.

No. 2011-0838

Supreme Court of Ohio

Submitted June 6, 2012—Decided June 19, 2012.

[Cite as State v. Mundy, 132 Ohio St.3d 128, 2012-Ohio-2677.]

{¶ 1} The certified question is answered in the affirmative. The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed, and the cause is remanded for application of State v. Harris, 132 Ohio St.3d 318, 2012-Ohio-1908, 972 N.E.2d 509.

O‘CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O‘DONNELL, CUPP, and MCGEE BROWN, JJ., concur.

LANZINGER, J., dissents.

Dean Holman, Medina County Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.

Raymont Mundy, pro se.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Mundy
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: Jun 19, 2012
Citation: 2012 Ohio 2677
Docket Number: 2011-0838
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In