State v. MundyState v. Mundy
{¶ 2} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the court of appeals for application of our decision in State v. Smith, 131 Ohio St.3d 297, 2012-Ohio-781, 964 N.E.2d 423.
O‘CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O‘DONNELL, LANZINGER, CUPP, and MCGEE BROWN, JJ., concur.
Bradley Collins, pro se.
{¶ 1} The certified question is answered in the affirmative. The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed, and the cause is remanded for application of State v. Harris, 132 Ohio St.3d 318, 2012-Ohio-1908, 972 N.E.2d 509.
O‘CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O‘DONNELL, CUPP, and MCGEE BROWN, JJ., concur.
LANZINGER, J., dissents.
Dean Holman, Medina County Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.
Raymont Mundy, pro se.