Cause No. DC-06-184C | Mont. | Feb 23, 2007
On October 4, 2006, the defendant was sentenced to the following: Count I: Five (5) years in the Montana State Prison for the offense of Tampering with or Fabricating Physical Evidence, a felony; and Count, II: Five (5) years in the Montana State Prison for the offense of Tampering with or Fabricating Physical Evidence, a felony. Counts I & II shall run concurrently with each other and with the sentence imposed in Cause No. DC-06-160C.
On February 8, 2007, the defendant’s application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.
The defendant was present and was represented by Eric Olson. The state was not represented.
Before hearing the application, the defendant was advised that the Sentence Review Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also increase it. The defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Sentence Review Division. The defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.
Rule 17 of the Rules of the Sentence Review Division ofthe Supreme Court of Montana provides that “the sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct, and the sentence will not be reduced or increased unless it is deemed clearly inadequate or excessive.” (§46-18-904(3), MCA).
The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is inadequate or excessive.
Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Sentence Review Division that the sentence shall be affirmed.