No. 98-KP-0262 | La. | May 15, 1998
In re State of Louisiana;—Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ;
Writ granted; revocation of probation reinstated. Because the state presented more than adequate factual support showing that Moore violated a term of his probation by-violating a law, La.C.Cr.P. art. 895(A); R.S. 15:542, and because Moore knew of the law, cf. State v. Sussmann, 374 So. 2d 1256" court="La." date_filed="1979-09-04" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/state-v-sussmann-1132896?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="1132896">374 So.2d 1256, 1259 (La.1979), no abuse of the district court’s discretion appears. La.C.Cr.P. art. 900; Sussmann, 374 So.2d at 1259; State v. Lassai, 366 So. 2d 1389" court="La." date_filed="1978-12-15" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/state-v-lassai-1607511?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="1607511">366 So.2d 1389, 1391 (La.1978); State ex rel. Robertson v. Maggio, 341 So. 2d 366" court="La." date_filed="1976-12-13" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/state-ex-rel-robertson-v-maggio-1814796?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="1814796">341 So.2d 366, 370 (La.1976).