State v. MooreState v. Moore
The state challenges the judgments and sentences imposed upon the appellee, Chuck Moore, after he pled nolo contendere to possession of cocaine and possession of drug paraphernalia. We reverse.
Since the appellee’s sentence was a downward departure from his permitted guidelines sentence, in order to be valid, the sentence must be supported by a proper reason for departing. See State v. Morales,
Since the appellee agreed to plead to the charges filed against him on the condition that he receive a sentence that we have herein determined to be improper, upon remand, the appellee should be given the opportunity to withdraw his plea and go to trial. Caride.
Reversed and remanded.