History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Moore
343 S.E.2d 430
N.C.
1986
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

The Court is evenly divided. Under these circumstances, following the uniform practice of this Court and the ancient rule of praesumitur pro negante, the decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed, not as precedent but as the decision in this case. Lynch v. Hazelwood, 312 N.C. 619, 324 S.E. 2d 224 (1985).

Affirmed.

Justice BILLINGS did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Moore
Court Name: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date Published: Jun 3, 1986
Citation: 343 S.E.2d 430
Docket Number: 771PA85
Court Abbreviation: N.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.