History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Mitchell
3 N.C. App. 70
N.C. Ct. App.
1968
Check Treatment
Campbell, J.

The defendants assign as error the imposition of five to seven years active sentences, contending that this constitutes cruel, unusual and unjust punishment in view of the age of the defendants, their past criminal records and the nature of the criminal acts. This is contained in the brief but not shown by the record. There is no merit in this assignment of error.

“We have held in case after case that when the punishment does not exceed the limits fixed by the statute, it cannot be considered cruel and unusual punishment in a constitutional sense.” State v. Elliott, 269 N.C. 683, 153 S.E. 2d 330. Mathis v. State of North Carolina, 266 F. Supp. 841 (M.D.N.C. 1967).

No error.

MallaRd, C.J. and MoRRis, J., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Mitchell
Court Name: Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Date Published: Nov 13, 1968
Citation: 3 N.C. App. 70
Docket Number: No. 6830SC288
Court Abbreviation: N.C. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.