23 Wis. 634 | Wis. | 1869
The defendant was sued before a justice of the peace in Racine city, for violating the city ordinance against selling liquor without a license. He objected that the justice had no jurisdiction, and, having appealed to the circuit court, he pleaded guilty, but procured- a certificate to this court of the questions, whether the prosecution was under the ordinance, and, if so, whether the justice had no jurisdiction.
There is no room for doubt that the complaint was under the ordinance. The ordinance is quoted in it, and the offense is expressly alleged to have been committed in violation of its provisions.
In respect to the other question, there is barely room to say, that there seems to be no express provision of law conferring, in so many words, on justices of the peace in that city, general jurisdiction of all offenses for the violation of city ordinances. Rut I think the jurisdiction is conferred by necessary implication.
It may, perhaps, be conceded that the provisions of section 61, chapter 98, Pr. and Local Laws of 1861, relate only to offenses
By the Court. — The questions certified by the circuit judge must be answered in the affirmative, and the cause remanded with directions to the circuit court to proceed to judgment against the defendant.