History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Melson
15 N.C. App. 586
N.C. Ct. App.
1972
Check Treatment
MALLARD, Chief Judge.

In his brief, defendant brings forward no assignments of error but urges this court to “examine the record for any error that may appear prejudicial to the appellant.” This *588constitutes an exception to the judgment and presents the face of the record on appeal for review. 3 Strong, N.C. Index 2d, Criminal Law, § 161, and cases cited therein.

The Attorney General states that he has carefully reviewed the organization of the court, the bill of indictment, the defendant’s plea, the verdict and the judgment in the case before us and has found no error.

The judgment in this case was supported by plenary competent evidence, the sentence is within statutory limits, and no prejudicial error appears on the face of the record on appeal. We find no error.

No error.

Judges Campbell and Britt concur.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Melson
Court Name: Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Date Published: Aug 2, 1972
Citation: 15 N.C. App. 586
Docket Number: No. 721SC501
Court Abbreviation: N.C. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.