History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Meadows
63 Ohio St. 3d 135
Ohio
1992
Check Treatment

Lead Opinion

The cause is affirmed on the authority of State v. Murnahan (1992), 63 Ohio St.3d 60, 584 N.E.2d 1204. However, defendant-appellant may file for delayed reconsideration of his ineffectiveness-of-counsel claim in the Hamilton County Court of Appeals.

Moyer, C.J., Holmes, Douglas and Resnick, JJ., concur.





Dissenting Opinion

Sweeney, J.,

dissents based on his dissent in State v. Murnahan (1992), 63 Ohio St.3d 60, 584 N.E.2d 1204.

Wright and H. Brown, JJ., dissent.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Meadows
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: Mar 4, 1992
Citation: 63 Ohio St. 3d 135
Docket Number: No. 91-1080
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.