midpage

State v. MeadorState v. Meador

Ohio Supreme Court
Nov 10, 2009
2009-0884
Versions:2009 Ohio 5861
123 Ohio St. 3d 450

{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is not accepted.

{¶ 2} The discretionary cross-appeal is accepted.

{¶ 3} The judgment of the court of appeals holding as moot the assignment of error in which appellant below challenged the sufficiency of the evidence is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the court of appeals for consideration of that assignment of error.

Judgment reversed and cause remanded.

MOYER, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, and CUPP, JJ., concur.

Rachel A. Hutzel, Warren County Prosecuting Attorney, and Michael Greer, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant and cross-appellee.

Fred S. Miller; and Repper, Pagan & Cook, Ltd. and Christopher J. Pagan, for appellee and cross-appellant.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Meador
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: Nov 10, 2009
Citations: 2009 Ohio 5861; 123 Ohio St. 3d 450; 2009-0884
Docket Number: 2009-0884
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
Log In