State v. Meacham

May 15, 1895
Reporters:
PER CURIAM.

In this case the views of ‍‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌​​​​‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​​​‌‌​‌​‌‌​​​​​‌‌​​​​​‌‌​​‌​‌‌‌​‌‌​​‌‌‌​​​​​‌‌‌​​‌​​​‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‍the judges who heard it were such that no decision could be made in ‍‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌​​​​‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​​​‌‌​‌​‌‌​​​​​‌‌​​​​​‌‌​​‌​‌‌‌​‌‌​​‌‌‌​​​​​‌‌‌​​‌​​​‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‍regard to the sufficiency of the information. But, inasmuch as the information of the ‍‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌​​​​‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​​​‌‌​‌​‌‌​​​​​‌‌​​​​​‌‌​​‌​‌‌‌​‌‌​​‌‌‌​​​​​‌‌‌​​‌​​​‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‍state’s attorney can be amended, by his successor in office, even, both in form ‍‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌​​​​‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​​​‌‌​‌​‌‌​​​​​‌‌​​​​​‌‌​​‌​‌‌‌​‌‌​​‌‌‌​​​​​‌‌‌​​‌​​​‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‍and in substance, the court pro forma reversed the judgment of the county court and remanded ‍‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌​​​​‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​​​‌‌​‌​‌‌​​​​​‌‌​​​​​‌‌​​‌​‌‌‌​‌‌​​‌‌‌​​​​​‌‌‌​​‌​​​‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‍the case to be there proceeded with.