State v. Meacham

67 Vt. 707 | Vt. | 1895

PER CURIAM.

In this case the views of the judges who heard it were such that no decision could be made in regard to the sufficiency of the information. But, inasmuch as the information of the state’s attorney can be amended, by his successor in office, even, both in form and in substance, the court pro forma reversed the judgment of the county court and remanded the case to be there proceeded with.

midpage