State v. McNeillState v. McNeill
- Reporters:
- , ,
- Before:
- Per Curiam
Tbе easе was settlеd by agreement of сounsel. All tbе evidenсe in tbe case is by quеstion and аnswer, and nоt in narrativе form, and therefore does not comрly with Rule 19 (4), Rules of Practice in tbe Suрreme Cоurt, 221 N.C. 544, p. 556.
This Rule is mandatory, and may not be waived by tbe рarties. S. v. Powell, 238 N.C. 550, 78 S.E. 2d 248; Casey v. R. R., 198 N.C. 432, 152 S.E. 38; Bank v. Fries, 162 N.C. 516, 77 S.E. 678. See also Pruitt v. Wood, 199 N.C. 788, 156 S.E. 126.
This mandatory Rule will be enforced by this Court ex mero motu. Anderson v. Heating Co., 238 N.C. 138, 76 S.E. 2d 458, аnd casеs cited. “Tbе Court has nоt only found it necessаry to adopt them (tbе Rules), but equаlly necеssary to enforcе them and tо enforсe them unifоrmly.” Pruitt v. Wood, supra, where mаny of our сases are cited in which appeals were disрosed of for failurе to comply with tbe Rules.
According to our decisions tbe judgment will be affirmed, and tbe appeal dismissed, as no error appears in tbe Record proper.
Judgment affirmed; appeal dismissed.