12 N.C. App. 23 | N.C. Ct. App. | 1971
The board and knife with which defendant allegedly assaulted his wife were introduced into evidence. Defendant’s sole assignment of error is that the judge instructed the jury that the board could be found to be a deadly weapon per se. The knife and board were not brought forward as exhibits on this appeal. It may have been that the judge could have instructed the jury as a matter of law that the weapons were inherently deadly or deadly per se. State v. Parker, 7 N.C. App. 191, 171 S.E. 2d 665; State v. West, 51 N.C. 505. The court did not, however, so instruct the jury but required the State to prove this beyond a reasonable doubt. The jury was instructed that before it could return a verdict of guilty it must find that the knife was of sufficient sharpness and size to penetrate a vital part of the body organs1 or that the defendant used a board of sufficient strength and size to inflict a fatal injury. It would seem that any effect of this precaution by the trial judge would be to the advantage of the defendant and not to his prejudice. State v. Cox, 11 N.C. App. 377, 181 S.E. 2d 205.
“Any person who assaults another person with a deadly weapon and inflicts serious injury is guilty of a felony punishable by a fine, imprisonment for not more than five (5) years, or both such fine and imprisonment.”
This act was ratified on 6 July 1971 and is effective as of 1 October 1971. As so rewritten the section becomes more meaningful.
Defendant’s assignment of error is overruled.
No error.