midpage

State v. . McLambState v. . McLamb

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Dec 19, 1924
Reporters:
, ,
Before:
Per Curiam.
Pee Curiam.

All the exceptions are based, directly or indirectly, on the .single proposition that the warrant as amended is not sufficient to sustain the verdict. The exceptions cannot be sustained. The amended warrant charges the defendant not only with an assault with a deadly *804 weapon, but with, an assault, whereby serious damage was done, and sets forth with sufficient particularity the nature and extent of the serious damage or injury alleged to have been inflicted. C. S., 1481, 4215; S. v. Huntley, 91 N. C., 617; S. v. Cunningham, 94 N. C., 824; S. v. Shelley, 98 N. C., 673.

We find

No error.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. . McLamb
Court Name: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date Published: Dec 19, 1924
Citations: 188 N.C. 803; 125 S.E. 530; 1924 N.C. LEXIS 178
Court Abbreviation: N.C.
Log In