History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. McKinney
104 S.C. 358
S.C.
1916
Check Treatment

June 28, 1916. The opinion of the Court was delivered by On trial of defendant for assault and battery with intent to kill, a witness, Brown, testified on the part of the State that he was working in the room in which the fight occurred; that he did not see the fight, but heard some one hollo, and looked and saw Smith, the prosecutor, holding his left side *Page 359 and bending over; that he ran to him, but, before he did, saw the defendant going through the door; that when he got to Smith (and he said he was the first one to get to him), he asked him what was the matter; that he replied, "Oh, Brown, McKinney has cut me all to pieces;" that he asked, "What did you let him do that for?" and he replied, "He cut me before I knew what he was doing." The single question is whether this declaration was properly admitted as part of the res gestae. The following cases show that it was: State v. Belcher, 13 S.C. 459; State v. McDaniel,68 S.C. 304, 47 S.E. 384, 102 Am. St. Rep. 661; State v.Way, 76 S.C. 91, 56 S.E. 653; State v. Martin, 94 S.C. 92,77 S.E. 721.

Judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. McKinney
Court Name: Supreme Court of South Carolina
Date Published: Jun 28, 1916
Citation: 104 S.C. 358
Docket Number: 9398
Court Abbreviation: S.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.