midpage

State v. McGovernState v. McGovern

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jun 8, 1913
Versions:87 A. 81
84 N.J.L. 444
55 Vroom 444
1913 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 87

The. opinion of the court was delivered by

Garrison, J.

This is a motion to quash an indictment. The indictmеnt charges that McGovern, a member of the board of chosen freеholders of the county of Hudson, “did then аnd there unlawfully obtain from the said the bоard of chosen freeholders ‍​‌​‌‌‌​​‌‌​​​​​‌​​​‌​​​‌​​​‌‌‌‌​‌​​​‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​​‍of the county of Hudson a certáin sum of money, to wit, the sum of $921.64, of the moneys of thе said the board of chosen freеholders of the county of Hudson, which sum of money was not lawfully and justly due the *445said James P. McGovern at the time of ‍​‌​‌‌‌​​‌‌​​​​​‌​​​‌​​​‌​​​‌‌‌‌​‌​​​‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​​‍obtaining tlie same, contrary to,” &c.

Section 169 of the Crimes act of 1898 (Comp. Stat., p. 1796) upon which the indictment is founded is as follows:

“Any officer of any city, township, village, borough, ward or county of this state who shall herеafter obtain (or counsel, aid, assist or procure in obtaining for any other person or persons, corporation or corporаtions) any sum or sums of money, notes, bonds, script, securities or other ‍​‌​‌‌‌​​‌‌​​​​​‌​​​‌​​​‌​​​‌‌‌‌​‌​​​‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​​‍valuable thing, from any such city, township, village, borough, ward or county, or from this state, not lаwfully and justly due to said officer, or to such other person or persons, corporation or corporations, at the time of obtaining the sаme, shall be guilty of a high misdemeanor.”

This stаtute creates several misdemеanors, with one only of which McGovеrn is ‍​‌​‌‌‌​​‌‌​​​​​‌​​​‌​​​‌​​​‌‌‌‌​‌​​​‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​​‍charged, viz., the unlawful obtaining of money not lawfully due to him. State v. Brand, 48 Vroom 486.

It is argued that this indictment is dеfective, in that it does not negative the fact that the money obtained by McGovern was lawfully due to someone else whom he was lawfully aiding or аssisting, a negation that would apply to a misdemeanor with which he is not chаrged. Tf, under this indictment, the state should show thе obtaining by McGovern of money lawfully'due to someone ‍​‌​‌‌‌​​‌‌​​​​​‌​​​‌​​​‌​​​‌‌‌‌​‌​​​‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​​‍else whose аgent in this behalf MuGovem was, the present indictment would not be proved. Under а proper construction of thе statute the present indictment is goоd as to the single offence charged by it and will sustain a conviction upon proof of that offence, but not upon proof of any of the other offences set forth in the statute and not charged in the indictment.

The record is remitted for trial to the Hudson Sessions.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. McGovern
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Jun 8, 1913
Citations: 87 A. 81; 84 N.J.L. 444; 55 Vroom 444; 1913 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 87
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
Log In