State v. McDonaldState v. McDonald
Defendant, who waived his right to a jury trial, was found guilty by the district court of a charge of burglary with tool,
Defendant’s conviction was based on evidence that defendant, while aided by two accomplices, entered a drugstore during business hours but at a time when the pharmacy was closed and, without consent, entered a closed storage room that was off limits to the general public and from there tried to gain access to the locked pharmacy for the purpose of stealing controlled substances. We reject the state’s contention that the evidence of burglary was complete upon entering that part of the store that was open to the public; the entry into that part of the store was with consent, pursuant to
There is no merit to defendant’s contention that the photographic identification procedures used by the police were so suggestive as to create a “very substantial likelihood of irreparable misidentification.”
Manson v. Brathwaite,
Affirmed.