History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. McCuin
829 P.2d 1217
Ariz.
1992
Check Treatment

OPINION

FELDMAN, Chief Justice.

The facts of this case are set forth in our opinion in State v. Noble, 171 Ariz. 171, 829 P.2d 1217 (1992), and in the court of appeals’ opinion in State v. McCuin, 167 Ariz. 447, 808 P.2d 332 (Ct.App.1991). For the reasons given in our opinion today in Noble, the trial court judgment is affirmed, and part IV of the court of appeals’ opinion is vacated.

MOELLER, V.C.J., CORCORAN, J., FRANK X. GORDON, Jr., J. (retired), and CARRUTH, Judge, concur. JAMES DUKE CAMERON, J. (retired), did not participate in this matter; pursuant to article 6, § 3 of the Arizona Constitution, JAMES C. CARRUTH, Judge, of the Pima County Superior Court was designated to sit in his stead.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. McCuin
Court Name: Arizona Supreme Court
Date Published: Apr 21, 1992
Citation: 829 P.2d 1217
Docket Number: CR-91-0065-PR
Court Abbreviation: Ariz.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In