State v. McCalpineState v. McCalpine
JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION
JUDGMENT: REVERSED AND REMANDED
RELEASED AND JOURNALIZED: March 17, 2022
Appearances:
Michael C. O’Malley, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, and Daniel T. Van, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant.
Cullen Sweeney, Cuyahoga County Public Defender, and Francis Cavallo, Assistant Public Defender, for appellee.
{¶ 1} Appellant, the state of Ohio, appeals from the felony prison sentence imposed on appellee Beatrice McCalpine.1 The trial court did not impose an indefinite sentence pursuant to the Reagan Tokes Law as defined in
{¶ 2} After being indicted for two counts of murder in violation of
{¶ 3} At the time of the plea, the trial court advised McCalpine of the indefinite sentence attendant to the voluntary manslaughter charge at the time of the plea. The trial court imposed the agreed aggregate sentence of 14 years’ imprisonment; however, it did not impose an indefinite sentence, citing this court’s
{¶ 4} The state alleges one assignment of error in this appeal, which reads, “The trial court erred when it found S.B. 201 to be unconstitutional and did not impose an indefinite sentence pursuant to S.B. 201.” The Ohio Revised Code provides the state the right to appeal a sentence if it is contrary to law.
{¶ 5} The Reagan Tokes Law provides that certain first- and second-degree felonies are qualifying offenses subject to an indefinite sentencing scheme.
{¶ 6} McCalpine was sentenced for voluntary manslaughter, a felony of the first degree subject to an indefinite sentence. This court, sitting en banc, vacated the decision the trial court relied upon in sentencing McCalpine. Accordingly, we find the sentence imposed to be contrary to law, sustain the state’s assignment of error, reverse the sentence imposed, and remand this matter to the trial court for the purpose of resentencing McCalpine.
It is ordered that appellant recover of appellee costs herein taxed.
The court finds there were reasonable grounds for this appeal.
It is ordered that a special mandate issue out of this court directing the common pleas court to carry this judgment into execution.
A certified copy of this entry shall constitute the mandate pursuant to Rule 27 of the Rules of Appellate Procedure.
MICHELLE J. SHEEHAN, JUDGE
KATHLEEN ANN KEOUGH, P.J., and EILEEN A. GALLAGHER, J., CONCUR