midpage

State v. MathewsState v. Mathews

Court of Appeals of Oregon
Oct 20, 1975
No. C-74-07-2146
Reporters:
,
Before:
Cttbtam
PEB CTTBTAM-

On petition for reconsideration defendant correctly points out that our opinion did not deal with one assignment of error — his contention that his motion for directed verdict should have been granted because there was no evidence showing knowledge on his part that the property in question was stolen. We find that there was.

Former opinion adhered to.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Mathews
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Oregon
Date Published: Oct 20, 1975
Citations: 541 P.2d 831; 23 Or. App. 162; No. C-74-07-2146
Docket Number: No. C-74-07-2146
Court Abbreviation: Or. Ct. App.
Log In