History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Mathews
4 Wash. App. 506
Wash. Ct. App.
1971
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

Defendant has appealed from a conviction of grand larceny. Defendant’s court-appointed counsel on appeal has filed an Anders brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967).

Defendant’s counsel has moved to withdraw and the prosecuting attorney moved to dismiss the appeal on the ground that it was frivolous.

We have reviewed the record and agree that no meritorious issues are presented by the record. Both motions are granted and the judgment and sentencé is affirmed.

It is so ordered.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Mathews
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Washington
Date Published: Mar 19, 1971
Citation: 4 Wash. App. 506
Docket Number: No. 247-2
Court Abbreviation: Wash. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.