198 Iowa 1325 | Iowa | 1924
— Frank Miller, the father of the prosecutrix, was called as a witness by the State, and testified to facts tending to corroborate her and to connect the defendant with the commission of the offense charged. On cross-examination, he was asked if he had not said to the defendant’s father, John Martinsen, that,
There was no sufficient exception to an instruction complained of. We may say, however, that the instruction appears to be susceptible of the construction that seduction might be
accomplished by a promise that was not false, and in that respect to run counter to State v. Hamann, 109 Iowa 646.
In view of a retrial, we refrain from comment on the evidence, or from a determination of the sufficiency of the corroboration or of the evidence to sustain the verdict.
We should, perhaps, add that the county attorney appears to have taken no part in the prosecution.
Because of the erroneous exclusion of testimony, as pointed