State v. MartinState v. Martin
Case Information
*1
[Cite as
State v. Martin
,
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT PORTAGE COUNTY, OHIO
STATE OF OHIO, : O P I N I O N
Plaintiff-Appellee, :
CASE NO. 2012-P-0114 - vs - :
CHARLES B. MARTIN, :
Defendant-Appellant. : Criminаl Appeal from the Portage County Court of Common Pleas, Case No. 2011 CR 0790.
Judgment: Affirmed.
Victor V. Vigluicci, Portage County Prosecutor, and Pamela J. Holder, Assistant Prosecutor, 241 South Chestnut Street, Ravenna, OH 44266 (For Plaintiff-Appellee). Chris Wells, P.O. Box 1487, Stow, OH 44224 (For Defendant-Appellant).
CYNTHIA WESTCOTT RICE, J. Appellant, Charles B. Martin, appeals the sentence of the Portage County
Court of Common Pleas following his guilty plea to gross sexual imposition of a four- year-old girl. At issue is whether appellant can successfully challenge his sentence in light of his failure to file a transcript of the proceedings in the trial court. For the reasons that follow, we affirm. Due to appellant’s failure to file a transcript, we are unaware of the facts in
this matter other than appellant’s few brief statements and admissions in his brief. *2 Appellant, who is 22 years old, admits that he is an acquaintance of the victim’s parents and that he had done lawn work for them in the past. He states that on July 23, 2011, the victim’s parents left their four-year-old daughter alone with him. Appellant states that on the next day, July 24, 2011, the victim’s parents reported to police that appellant had engaged in sexual conduct with their child. As a result, appellant was questioned by police; submitted a DNA sample to them; and was subsequently arrested for the offenses charged in the indictment. On December 15, 2011, appellant was indicted for two counts of
attempted rape, each being a felony of the second degree, in violation of
plea negotiations and that appellant had agreed to a plea bargain pursuant to which he would plead guilty to one count of gross sexual imposition, a felony of the third degree, and the remaining charges would be nolled. On April 24, 2012, the court held a guilty plea hearing. Appellant did not
file a transcript of this hearing on appeal. According to his “Written Plea of Guilty,” the court advised appellant that the offense to which he was pleading guilty was gross sexual imposition, a third-degree felony; that the maximum sentence for this offense was five years in prison; and that upon acceptance of his guilty plea, the court could *3 immediately sentence him. The trial court thus advised appellant of the effect of his guilty plea. Appellant indicated he understood the foregoing. Further, according to the written guilty plea, the court advised appellant of
his right to a jury trial at which he would have the right to confront and cross-examine the witnesses against him, the right to compulsory process, and the right to require the state to prove his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt at a trial at which he cоuld not be compelled to testify against himself. Appellant indicated he understood his trial rights and wanted to waive them. He signed his guilty plea to one count of gross sexual imposition, a felony of the third degree. The court then entered a nolle prosequi to the remaining counts of the indiсtment. The court found that appellant understood and waived his trial rights before entering his guilty plea and that he understood the effect of his plea. By the court’s separate judgment entry, dated April 26, 2012, the court
found that appellant’s guilty plea was voluntary; accepted his plea; found him guilty of gross sexual imposition; accepted the nolle prosequi to the remaining charges; and referred appellant to the probation department for a pre-sentence investigation. On July 16, 2012, the court conducted a sentencing hearing. Again, appellant did not filе a transcript of this hearing on appeal. In the court’s sentencing entry, the court stated that in sentencing appellant, it considered, inter alia, the evidence presented by counsel, oral statements, and appellant’s statement. However, because appеllant did not file a transcript of the sentencing hearing, none of the evidence presented at the sentencing hearing is before us. According to the sentencing entry, *4 the court sentenced appellant to a definite term of five years in prison, the maximum term for a third-degree felony.
{¶9} Appellant appeals his sentence, asserting the following for his sole assignment of error:
{¶10}
“The trial court erred in ordering a five year prison sentence contrary to the
sentencing principles in O.
{¶11}
Appellant argues that by imposing the maximum sentence, the trial court
did not properly apply the principles of felony sentencing in
{¶12} At the outset, we note that appellant indicated in his notice of appeal that he did not order either a complete or partial transcript from the court reporter and that no transcript is necessary. However, it is well settled that “[a]n appellant is required to provide a
transcript for appellate review.” Warren v. Clay , 11th Dist. No. 2003-T-0134, 2004-
Ohio-4386, ¶4, citing Knapp v. Edwards Laboratories , 61 Ohio St.2d 197, 199 (1980).
“Such is necessary because an appellant shoulders the burden of demonstrating error
by referencе to matters within the record.” Warren , supra , citing State v. Skaggs , 53
Ohio St.2d 162, 163 (1978). This court in Warren stated:
This principle is embodied in
shall order from the reporter a complete transcript or a transcript of
thе parts of the proceedings not already on file as the appellant
considers necessary for inclusion in the record and file a copy of
the order with the clerk. * * * If the appellant intends to urge on
*5
appeal that a finding or conclusion is unsupported by the evidеnce
or is contrary to the weight of the evidence, the appellant shall
include in the record a transcript of all evidence relevant to the
[findings] or conclusion.” Warren at ¶6, quoting
errors are omitted from the record, an appellate court has nothing to pass upon. As appellant cannot demonstrate these errors, the court has no choice but to presume the validity of the lower court’s proceedings.” Warren at ¶7, citing Knapp , supra . Further, this court has held that when a defendant’s appeal challenges his
sentence, a transcript of the sentencing hearing is necessary. Warren at ¶3. Because appellant challenges the trial court’s application of the
sentencing guidelines in
argument would still fail. Specifically, he argues that, because the state accepted his guilty plea to only one of five charged offenses and the offense to which he pled guilty was not the most serious of these offenses, these circumstances show this was not the worst form of the offense, making the maximum sentence inappropriate. Appellant apparently argues the trial court was required tо find that he committed the worst form of the offense to support the court’s maximum sentence and that these circumstances do not support such finding. However, “[t]rial courts have full discretion to impose a prison sentence
within the statutory range and are no longer required to makе findings or give their
reasons for imposing maximum * * * sentences.” State v. Foster , 109 Ohio St.3d 1,
considered the purposes of felony sentencing as set forth in
{¶22} For the reasons stated in this opinion, appellant’s assignment of error is overruled. It is the judgment and order of this court that the judgment of the Portage County Court of Common Pleas is affirmed.
THOMAS R. WRIGHT, J., concurs with a Concurring Opinion, COLLEEN MARY O’TOOLE, J., dissents with a Dissenting Opinion.
_____________________
THOMAS R. WRIGHT, J., concurs with a Concurring Opinion. I concur with the lead opinion to the extent that appellant has the burden
of demonstrating error. Therefore, the failure to provide a transcript requires this court
to affirm regardless of the standard of review. Regarding the dissent, appellant’s
remedy, if any, for the failure to file a transcript must be addressed in an application for
reopening under
_____________________
COLLEEN MARY O’TOOLE, J., dissents with a Dissenting Opinion. I respectfully dissent. In affirming the judgment of the trial court, the majority contends that
appellant cannot successfully challenge his sentence on appeal because his assigned *8 counsel failed to file a transcript from the sentencing hearing. The majority proceeds to assert that even if appellant did file a transcript, his argument would still fail.
{¶26}
On appeal, appellant maintains “[t]he trial court erred in ordering a five
year prison sentence contrary to the sentencing principles in O.
judgment. The majority correctly points out that
St.2d 6, 9 (1980): “The United States Supreme Court has given rather significant prоcedural
guarantees in criminal cases, including the right to counsel and a transcript at public
expense for appeals as of right. The right to a transcript for indigents was established in
Griffin v. Illinois (1956),
appellant’s own attorney, assigned by the court, is complicit in his failure to file a
transcript; there is no legitimate trial strategy that would substantiate this position.
Appellant has a constitutional right to the transcript, which is necеssary to determine his
assigned error on appeal and to guarantee his right to an effective and complete appeal
of this case. The majority presumes the validity of the lower court’s proceedings in
affirming the trial court’s judgment without a complete review of thе record. Judicial
economy as well as appellant’s right to due process, to effective counsel, to a transcript
at state’s expense, and to a complete appeal belie this position. I believe this case
should be remanded prior to issuing our opinion, so that appellant’s assigned counsel
can comply with
the 2008 plurality opinion in State v. Kalish ,
30 days for appellant’s assigned counsel to order a transcript of the proceedings at public expense in order for this court to properly address appellant’s sentencing argument on appeal. Thus, I dissent.