History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Marshall
199 Conn. 244
Conn.
1986
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

After examining the record on appeal and after considering the briefs and the arguments of the parties, we have concluded that the appeal in this case should be dismissed on the ground that certification was improvidently granted. The issues have been fully considered in the opinion of the Appellate Court; State v. Marshall, 3 Conn. App. 126, 485 A.2d 930 (1985); and it would serve no useful purpose for us to repeat the discussion therein contained.

The appeal is dismissed.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Marshall
Court Name: Supreme Court of Connecticut
Date Published: Mar 25, 1986
Citation: 199 Conn. 244
Docket Number: 12692
Court Abbreviation: Conn.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.