History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Marshall
19 Nev. 240
Nev.
1885
Check Treatment

By the Court,

Belknap, C. J.:

Appellant was convicted of the crime of manslaughter upon an indictment charging him with murder. The only exception arises upon the order of the district court denying a motion for a continuance of the cause, made upon the ground of the absence of one of the witnesses for the defendant. The affidavit upon which the motion is based is fatally defective in this: it fails to show that there are not other persons by whom the defendant could prove the same facts that he expected to prove by the absent witness.

The judgment of the district court is affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Marshall
Court Name: Nevada Supreme Court
Date Published: Oct 15, 1885
Citation: 19 Nev. 240
Docket Number: No. 1224
Court Abbreviation: Nev.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.