| Iowa | Dec 15, 1922
-This appeal is in a narrow compass and involves the construction of Code Section 5506 as applied to tbe terms of tbe bond in suit.
On tbe fact side tbe record discloses that tbe defendant B. F. Marquardt was indicted March 22, 1917 by tbe grand jury of "Winnebago County, Iowa for tbe crime of liquor nuisance. Tbe trial on tbe indictment resulted in a verdict of guilty, and tbe defendant was sentenced to pay a fine of $450, an attorney fee of $50, and costs in tbe sum of $150.75, and to stand committed at bard labor in tbe jail of Winnebago County, Iowa until said fine was paid, not exceeding 135 days. Bond on appeal was fixed at $600. Judgment ivas entered accordingly, and thereafter an appeal was perfected to tbe Supreme Court of Iowa and an appeal bond was filed containing inter alia tbe following recital: “Now if the said Ben Marquardt will prosecute bis appeal and will pay said fine adjudged against him or so much thereof -as tbe Supreme Court may direct and in all respects abide tbe orders and judgment of tbe Supreme Court on appeal, # * * then this obligation to be void, otherwise in full force. ’ ’
This bond was signed by tbe defendant Marquardt, as prin
A mittimus caused tbe defendant Marquardt to be imprisoned in tbe county jail for tbe time specified in tbe judgment. Thereupon tbe clerk of tbe dictrict court entered of record a release of tbe appeal bond and an exoneration of tbe sureties pursuant to Code Section 5519. On November 29, 1921 plaintiff State of Iowa filed its motion to set aside tbe release of tbe bond making tbe original defendant and bis sureties defendants in the action.
Upon due notice to all parties and after a bearing in said matter judgment was entered by tbe trial court setting aside tbe purported release and satisfaction of tbe appeal bond and determining that said bond is in full force and effect. From tbe judgment entered this appeal is taken.
Code Section 5506 provides that after conviction and upon an appeal to the Supreme Court, if from a judgment imposing a fine, tbe defendant must furnish a bond conditioned that be will in all respects abide tbe orders and tbe judgment of tbe Supreme Court in said cause. This is not a case involving tbe appearance of a defendant in order that tbe judgment of a court may be performed.' Tbe bond in suit is not an appearance bond. Tbe undertaking of tbe bond is in legal effect tbe securing tbe assessment of a fine and tbe obligation to pay said fine in tbe event a reversal of tbe judgment was not obtained. Tbe judgment was affirmed, and tbe fine has not been paid.
Tbe provisions of Code Section 5519 upon wbicb appellants bottom this appeal are not applicable or controlling. Nor is the fact that tbe defendant Marquardt has been incareei'ated in tbe county jail for tbe period of sentence for failure to pay tbe fine a material circumstance. Nothing has happened to affect tbe conditions of tbe bond or tbe recitals in tbe judgment. Tbe sureties expressly obligated themselves to perform the judg
We accept the reasoning and the conclusion announced in Muscatine County v. Oliver, 159 Iowa 417" court="Iowa" date_filed="1913-02-19" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/muscatine-county-v-oliver-7115386?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="7115386">159 Iowa 417, and in State v. Meier 96 Iowa 375" court="Iowa" date_filed="1895-12-13" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/state-v-meier-7107035?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="7107035">96 Iowa 375. The ruling of the trial court was correct and the judgment entered is therefore — Affirmed.