History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Marcoplos
357 N.C. 245
N.C.
2003
Check Treatment
580 S.E.2d 691 (2003)

STATE of North Carolina,
v.
Mark MARCOPLOS, Nancy Woods, Pascal L. Pitts, Laura Winbush Vanderbeck, James Edwin Warren, and Ruth C. Zalph.

No. 48A03.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 13, 2003.

Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by William P. Hart, Special Deputy Attorney General, for the State.

Glenn, Mills & Fisher, P.A. by Stewart W. Fisher, Durham; and George Hausen, Raleigh, for defendant-appellants.

PER CURIAM.

Defendants appeal to this Court from the decision of the Court of Appeals on the basis of a dissent. We affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals.

Defendants, in their brief and at oral argument, further sought review in this Court of a constitutional issue originally presented to but not addressed by the Court of Appeals. We decline to consider this constitutional issue in the first instance. This matter is remanded to the Court of Appeals so that this issue may be addressed by that court.

AFFIRMED and REMANDED.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Marcoplos
Court Name: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date Published: Jun 13, 2003
Citation: 357 N.C. 245
Docket Number: 48A03
Court Abbreviation: N.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.