History
  • No items yet
midpage
555 A.2d 1122
N.J.
1989
PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the Appellate Division opinion reported at 227 N.J.Super. 92 (1988).

For affirmance—Chief Justice WILENTZ and Justices CLIFFORD, HANDLER, POLLOCK, O’HERN, GARIBALDI and STEIN—7.

For reversal—None.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Marchand
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Apr 17, 1989
Citations: 555 A.2d 1122; 1989 N.J. LEXIS 41; 114 N.J. 569
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In
    State v. Marchand, 555 A.2d 1122