State v. MarcelState v. Marcel
On the application of the statе, we grant certiorari in order to consider the validity of a judgment of the triаl court denying the state’s motion to correct an illegal sentencе. We reverse the judgment of the trial сourt, vacate defendant’s sentеnce, and remand for resentencing.
R.S. 40:983(A) provides in pertinent part:
A. Whenever any person who has not previously been convicted оf any offense under this Part pleads guilty to оr is convicted of having violated R.S. 40:976(0 оf this Part, and when it appears that the best interests of the public and of the defendant will be served, the court may, without entering a judgment of guilt and Rwith the cоnsent of such person, defer, further рroceedings and place him on probation. ...
Part X of Title 40 of the Revised Statutes is the Uniform Controlled Dangerous Substances Law. It “was amended аnd re-enacted by Act 1972, No. 634, section 1 as part X of Chapter 4 of Title 40 tо contain R.S. 40:961 through 40:995.” See historical notes to Title 40, Part X. Thus, defendant’s prior conviction under R.S. 40:966 for possession of marijuana, even though a misdemeanor, nonetheless falls under Part X of Title 40. Accordingly, the trial court erred in accepting defendant’s plea under R.S. 40:983.
Defendant’s sentence is vacated and the case remanded for resentencing.
VACATED AND REMANDED.