History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Maples
232 N.C. 732
N.C.
1950
Check Treatment
Pee OuRiAM.

Tbe judgment of tbe court below dismissing defendant’s ■purported appeal from tbe county court must be affirmed on authority of S. v. King, 222 N.C. 137, 22 S.E. 2d 241; S. v. Miller, 225 N.C. 213, 34 S.E. 2d 143; and S. v. Farrar, 226 N.C. 478, 38 S.E. 2d 193. Since tbe court below bad no jurisdiction to bear tbe appeal, we have none. Shepard v. Leonard, 223 N.C. 110, 25 S.E. 2d 445. Therefore, we have mo authority, on this appeal, to entertain defendant’s motion in arrest of judgment.

Appeal dismissed.

JOHNSON, J., took no part in tbe consideration or decision of this case.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Maples
Court Name: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date Published: Nov 29, 1950
Citation: 232 N.C. 732
Court Abbreviation: N.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.