midpage

State v. ManshackState v. Manshack

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Feb 16, 1984
No. 84-K-0098
Versions:444 So. 2d 1212
1984 La. LEXIS 8195

Lead Opinion

In Re ROGER DALE MANSHACK, applying for Writ of Review, to the Court of Appeal Second Circuit, No. 15,625-KA, c/w (15,546-KA & 15,601-KA); Parish of DeSo-to, Eleventh Judicial District Court, NO. 48,634.

Case Below: 442 So.2d 1195.

Denied.






Concurrence Opinion

LEMMON, Justice,

concurs.

We have properly relegated to post-conviction proceedings relator’s claim of insufficient assistance of counsel in failing to rebut inaccurate information in the presen-tence investigation report. If relator can show that the “crime spree” referred to in the report is inaccurate, he is entitled to be resentenced. However, the trial court could have avoided this problem by telling defendant on the record the substance of the contents of the report and by specifically affording defendant an opportunity on the record to rebut any inaccurate statement.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Manshack
Court Name: Supreme Court of Louisiana
Date Published: Feb 16, 1984
Citations: 444 So. 2d 1212; 1984 La. LEXIS 8195; No. 84-K-0098
Docket Number: No. 84-K-0098
Court Abbreviation: La.
Log In