No. 88-2105 | Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Apr 11, 1989
Appellee concedes that the sentence must be reversed because the trial court failed to give written reasons to support a downward departure from the sentencing guidelines. See State v. Jackson, 478 So. 2d 1054" date_filed="1985-10-17" court="Fla." case_name="State v. Jackson">478 So.2d 1054 (Fla.1985); State v. Dixon, 539 So. 2d 38" date_filed="1989-03-14" court="Fla. Dist. Ct. App." case_name="State v. Dixon">539 So.2d 38 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); State v. Vickery, 536 So. 2d 380" date_filed="1989-01-03" court="Fla. Dist. Ct. App." case_name="State v. Vickery">536 So.2d 380 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); State v. Martinez, 534 So. 2d 1248" date_filed="1988-12-20" court="Fla. Dist. Ct. App." case_name="State v. Martinez">534 So.2d 1248 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); State v. Wayda, 533 So. 2d 939" date_filed="1988-11-22" court="Fla. Dist. Ct. App." case_name="Bathurst v. Turner">533 So.2d 939 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); State v. Adams, 528 So. 2d 548" date_filed="1988-07-26" court="Fla. Dist. Ct. App." case_name="State v. Adams">528 So.2d 548 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988).
The sentence is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings.