State v. MakiState v. Maki
- Reporters:
- , ,
- Before:
- Murphy
Appeal from an order of the municipal court of the city of Duluth dismissing a complaint after a preliminary hearing. The complaint charged defendant with alleged violation of statutes relating to possession of prohibited drugs, Minn. St. 1969, §§ 618.02 and 152.09. The state contends here that the municipal court misconceived its role as a magistrate in preliminary examination and functioned as a trier of fact in determining guilt or innocence rather than passing upon the issue of whether the evidence presented by the prosecution was sufficient to establish probable cause that defendant was guilty of a public offense. State v. Schwartz, 266 Minn. 104, 122 N. W. 2d 769 (1963); State ex rel. Hastings v. Bailey, 263 Minn. 261, 116 N. W. 2d 548 (1962).
We hold that, on the record, the order of the magistrate is not appealable. The state apparently finds support for the appeal from the provisions of Minn. St. 632.11, subd. 1, which provide in part:
“In criminal cases the state may appeal in the following instances :
“(1) From an order, the substantive effect of which is to dismiss an indictment, information or complaint.”
Appeal dismissed.