History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. MacFarland
136 N.J.L. 543
| N.J. | 1948
|
Check Treatment

The judgment below is affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the Supreme Court.

The alleged fatal variance between the proof and the indictment and the impropriety of certain questions to the plaintiff in error in reference to his knowledge concerning R.S. 40:25-2 were not assigned as the basis for reversal in the assignments of error and the causes for reversal filed below. The Supreme Court therefore did not decide or pass upon the questions and they cannot be presented or considered in this court. State v.Lavieri, 93 N.J.L. 201.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, BODINE, DONGES, WACHENFELD, BURLING, DILL, FREUND, MCLEAN, SCHETTINO, JJ. 9.

For reversal — None. *Page 544

Case Details

Case Name: State v. MacFarland
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Jan 29, 1948
Citation: 136 N.J.L. 543
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.